Loading edition…
The River Your Parents Used to Swim In

The River Your Parents Used to Swim In

They point at it from the bridge now. Not at something you can do but at something that was done, once, in a different version of the same place.

The river that runs through many Malaysian towns and cities has had more than one life. There is the current life, visible from roads and bridges: water of uncertain colour, moving between concrete banks, past the back of shophouses and factory walls. There is the previous life, which lives in the memories of a generation that is now in its fifties and sixties, who swam in it as children and caught fish in it and played along its banks on afternoons that felt much longer than afternoons feel now.

These two rivers occupy the same geographic coordinates but are not, in any experiential sense, the same place. The physical transformation happened gradually, through the accumulation of decades of development, changing land use, runoff from roads and agricultural areas, industrial discharge that was or wasn't managed, urban growth that treated the river as a drain rather than an ecosystem. The people who watched it change mostly watched it too slowly to clearly see the change happening.

The generation born after the transformation simply knows the river as it currently is. For them, there is no before. The river at the edge of town is a thing you look at from a bridge or ignore from a car. The idea of swimming in it registers as unfamiliar, not as a loss, because you can't lose something you never had.

The generation that did swim in it carries a double consciousness about the same water. They can describe the colour it used to be, the temperature of it on a hot afternoon, the specific pools where the swimming was good. They can stand on the same bridge their children stand on and see, through memory overlaid on the present view, two rivers at once.

This matters beyond sentiment. The river shaped how people understood and used the landscape around them. It was a gathering place, a food source, a measure of the seasons. When it became too polluted to swim in, to fish in, to be near without a reason, something changed in the relationship between communities and their environment that didn't happen quickly or loudly but is now complete.

Efforts to restore rivers exist and some have produced partial results. The visible water quality has improved in certain stretches. But restoration is slower and less certain than degradation. The communities downstream of cleaner water don't automatically redevelop the habits and uses that existed before the pollution arrived. The relationship, once broken, takes more than clean water to rebuild.

A child standing on the bridge today is looking at a river. A grandparent standing on the same bridge is looking at what a river used to be, and what they used to be in relation to it.

Neither version is wrong. The grandparent's river was also real. It just isn't the one there now.